code-feedback

A powerful, open-source Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for automated, multi-language code feedback, validation, and project analysis. Designed for developers, teams, and LLM-powered workflows to ensure code quality, correctness, and maintainability across diverse languages and build systems.

What does this entry provide?

code-feedback is an MCP server entry in ChatHome Skills, sourced from GitHub MCP Search and scored 33/100. A powerful, open-source Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for automated, multi-language code feedback, validation, and project analysis. Designed for develope. As a Model Context Protocol server, it exposes tools that MCP-compatible LLM clients such as Claude, Cursor, and Copilot can call directly, extending an agent's reach beyond its built-in capabilities. ChatHome Skills discovered this entry through its daily ingest of official registries and GitHub discovery queries, and re-verifies repository facts, freshness signals, and install metadata on every run. The quality score weighs official-registry presence, a working install command, license clarity, GitHub star trajectory, and repository freshness — the full formula is on the Sources page. The install command above is ready to copy. Review the last-pushed date and repository status before adding code-feedback to a production agent workflow; the snapshot facts below are point-in-time values from the most recent ingest.

Snapshot facts

Source: GitHub MCP Search
Quality: 33/100
Install method: source code
Repo: niradler/code-feedback
Repo updated: Jul 7, 2025

Source checkout

git clone https://github.com/niradler/code-feedback.git

Install method: source code

Review the upstream source before running this command.

GitHub project

Quality

Repo stars

Repo updated

Jul 7, 2025

How is this score calculated?

Weighted across six dimensions, scored 0-100.
Provenance (25): listed in an official or curated registry.
Installability (25): a runnable install command beats a declared transport, which beats a source checkout.
Maintenance (20): recency of the last push; archived entries score zero here.
Adoption (20): repository stars on a log curve.
Documentation (10) and description quality (10): parsed manifest or SKILL.md frontmatter, and a real description rather than a placeholder.

Security signals

Scan coverage: Install metadata and repository README.

Automated signals from install metadata and a bounded skill body — not a full code security audit and not a recursive source or dependency review.

MCP manifest

{
  "fullName": "niradler/code-feedback"
}

Discovery note

Report an issue with this listing