QA control plane for the Luke monorepo. Decides what deterministic evidence is sufficient to consider a change correct, across lint, typecheck, Node unit, real-browser component, Postgres integration and Playwright E2E — then assesses, writes or executes that evidence. Reports PASS / FAIL / SKIPPED / QA GAP with residual risk rather than a bare green tick. Use after implementing a feature or fixing a bug, before committing. Modes: /luke-test (assess, read-only) | write | verify. Scoping: default = diff vs merge-base. /luke-test write apps/api | --since <ref>
这个条目提供什么？
luke-test 是 ChatHome Skills 收录的 技能 条目，来源为 GitHub Skill Search，质量分 58/100。 # Luke QA Control Plane The question this skill answers is: > **What deterministic evidence is sufficient to consider this change correct?** Not "which tests sh. 作为 agent 技能，它把一组可复用的任务指令打包成 Codex 和 Claude Code 等 AI 编程 agent 可直接加载的格式，无需为该任务手写胶水代码。 该条目由 ChatHome Skills 的每日抓取从官方 registry 和 GitHub 发现查询中收录，每次运行都会重新核验仓库事实、新鲜度信号和安装元数据。 质量分综合了官方 registry 收录情况、可用安装命令、许可证完整性、仓库活跃度和 GitHub star 趋势，完整算法说明见来源页。安装命令已列于上方，可直接复制使用。 在将 luke-test 加入生产 agent 工作流前，请核对上方的最近更新日期和仓库状态——下方事实快照是最近一次抓取的时点值。
某个来源结构上无法提供的维度（registry 不提供 star 和许可证）不计入该条目的平均分，而不是记为 0 分，因此不同来源的条目仍可横向比较。
安全信号
扫描范围: 安装元数据与已收录的文档正文。
基于安装元数据和有界技能正文的自动风险信号，不是完整代码安全审计，也不会递归审查源码或依赖。
发现备注
# Luke QA Control Plane The question this skill answers is: > **What deterministic evidence is sufficient to consider this change correct?** Not "which tests should I write". Writi
Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.