pr-review
Evidence-based code review of a GitHub PR. Validates PR prerequisites, CI status and log sanity, technical rules (scope, diff coverage ~95%, single-responsibility, no side effects, DRY, ≤30-line methods, ≤4 positional args), system seams, and the security (incl. LLM/agent surface and CI supply chain), data handling and dependency checks, then writes review comments tagged [r]equired / [o]ptional / [f]uture / [c]uriosity. Use when the user says "review this PR", "review PR 123", "security review of this PR", "/pr-review", or asks for a code review of a pull request. Docs-only or proposal PRs need a design-doc review instead.
Score38
How is this score calculated?
- Weighted across six dimensions, scored 0-100.
- Provenance (25): listed in an official or curated registry.
- Installability (25): a runnable install command beats a declared transport, which beats a source checkout.
- Maintenance (20): recency of the last push; archived entries score zero here.
- Adoption (20): repository stars on a log curve.
- Documentation (10) and description quality (10): parsed manifest or SKILL.md frontmatter, and a real description rather than a placeholder.
- Dimensions a source cannot supply — registries publish no stars or license — are excluded from the entry's own average instead of counted as zero, so entries stay comparable across sources.
- Security signals subtract up to 20. Scores are recomputed on every daily ingest.
codex skill install integral-llc/skillsDetails